CWF- Grant Apoplication

Grants & Grant Applications

There is not a successful professional who can do all that is desired or required by relying solely on the budget of today’s nonprofit organization. Ideas and ideals exceed resources. One way to add to an organization’s resources is to request grants from foundations, corporations, or government agencies or even from individuals.
Grant getting, however, continues to be increasingly competitive. If your proposal is to be among the 10% funded, you will want to learn how to compete positively.
Funding is idea-dependent. To receive a grant, you must be able to put your idea into a package that successfully markets the idea. An idea is an abstraction. It must be converted into a tangible format.
A proposal must be competitive to have the benefit of a full review. Unfortunately, many proposals are so poorly written they aren’t even eligible for submission. They often lack clearly stated objectives; the budget doesn’t match the narrative; the needs don’t match the interest areas of the funding source; and guidelines are often not followed. Most importantly, proposal writers fail to put themselves into the mind-set of the proposal reviewer and, therefore, write only from their organization’s viewpoint and expectations.
Successful Proposal Writing
Successful proposal writing involves a series of interdependent steps:

1. Locate and use funding source directories and identify funding sources.
2. Interact positively with the policies of the submitting organization and the funding source.
3. Develop an idea from abstraction to a well-articulated written presentation requesting financial support.
4. Organize and write a competitive proposal eligible for submission.
5. Develop a budget consistent with proposal objectives.
6. Process a grant request through the submitting organization to the funding source.
7. Respond to the demands of the proposal review process.

Although foundation requirements and procedures vary widely, there are some common elements that are useful to consider when approaching a foundation for funding.
The following is a suggested strategy for approaching foundations and a basic framework for preparing the first written presentation of a funding request.
Basic Framework
The cost of operating community-based nonprofit organizations is growing, competition for funding is considerable, and government funding is likely going to continue to shrink. Although foundation funding is a small portion of the total financial resources in the nonprofit sector, it is one source of new funding for program innovations. Therefore, the competition for foundation funding is very high. The sad truth is that organizations do not automatically obtain grants from foundations simply because they represent a good organization doing good things. In order to secure funding, a lot of homework needs to be done. The key information includes what funders are interested in, how to approach them, and how to present ideas to them.
Find a match
One of the goals of funding development through grants should be to find a match between your organization’s mission and the mission of the foundation. Once the match between missions is found, the challenge is to build a working relationship with the foundation staff. The first thing to remember is that every foundation is absolutely distinctive. Each one has its own mission, strategies, and funding priorities. Each one has different rules and requirements. The most important thing is to do the homework before approaching any funder.
Research
Before a search for funding is initiated, be sure you know what you’re looking for. Don’t start by listing all your organization’s needs and then see what’s available. Define the highest priority of your organization that cannot be met by existing or projected internal budget. Then search for an agency that is interested in the same priority.
If one is not careful, a haphazard approach to locating a funding source can be a colossal waste of time. But help is available. Funding agency priorities are usually well defined.
The best place to start is at the Foundation Center online library www.fdcenter.org. In addition, there are multiple cooperating libraries in most states and nearly every public library has a copy of the Foundation Directory (which contains detailed information on almost all foundations).
The research should result in a list of foundations which: make grants in areas related to your work; are interested in the type of project and audience in question; and their requirements (i.e., application forms, deadlines, supporting materials needed, address, telephone and fax numbers, and email and web address).
This information sets the stage for a contact with foundations. Call or write to a number of foundations and request additional information to get to know them better and help identify if there is a close match between your project and their missions. Documents that will be useful in this decision-making process include annual reports, informational brochures, and application packets.
Once these materials have been studied and a good potential match has been identified, it is time to begin to help the foundation agree with that decision. The typical foundation receives many more proposals than it can fund each year.
Make your proposal stand out
The challenge, then, becomes making your proposal stand out from the large number of proposals received by foundations. This is very difficult to do in a proposal addressed “To Whom It May Concern.” It is far better to try to make a direct contact with a program staff person at a foundation of interest. This will improve the odds for your proposal by reducing the number of proposals in the competitive review pool from thousands to hundreds.
Personal Contact
Your task is to identify the most appropriate person to contact, talk with the identified program staff person about your proposed project idea and seek advice and direction about next steps to take. Finding out the best approach for each foundation is critical, and it is important to “play by their rules.”
Do Not send a full proposal
Do not – repeat, do not – send a full proposal to start with. Send a short “pre-proposal” instead.
PRE-PROPOSAL
Be Brief
The key is to be as brief as possible. Program staff read hundreds of proposals every year. Some of them are 100 pages long.
2 to 3 pages
If a two- or three-page pre-proposal is sent, it already has a better chance of getting a thorough review. The brief and concise document can help the program staff person identify if the project idea matches the foundation’s mission. If there is agreement on the match, then a full proposal can be developed.
Basic Information
Any number of approaches to a pre-proposal will surely work just fine with most foundations, so long as it contains the basic information needed to understand the project idea. The document should not contain a long statement of the problem the proposed project is trying to solve. Program staff have read about the problems hundreds of times, and they do not need to read them again.
Start the pre-proposal with a one-sentence statement of the problem. Now, comes the important part. What will the proposed project do about it? Present two or three solid paragraphs on how the project plans to solve this problem. Remember, the program staff person knows nothing about your specific project and will need to know exactly how you plan to manage it. It always helps to share a timeline for implementing the project.
Continuation Plan
Now comes the part of the pre-proposal that almost no one thinks to write: the continuation plan. Once the project has started, how will it be kept going? Remember that foundations like to start new things, but they generally o not like to fund anything 100 percent and they never like to fund anything forever. So it is important to tell, in one or two paragraphs, how much of your organization’s own money will be invested in the project, and how funds will be raised from other sources to keep it going after foundation funding ends. If there are a couple of paragraphs on this subject, your pre-proposal will be ahead of 90 percent of the proposals received by foundations. Most organizations are so focused on acquiring the money to get the project started, that they do not even think about how they are going to obtain the money to keep it going. A thoughtful, honest, and clear continuation plan is essential.
Evaluation
The pre-proposal needs to have a paragraph or two on how your organization intends to evaluate the results of the project. The evaluation plan should present what the organization wants to learn and how they will use the information to improve and sustain the project. It never hurts to ask a foundation for some money to hire an expert on the topic from another location to come in and evaluate the project. This will help both you and the funder to gauge how successful the project has been, and to learn lessons that will improve your work in the future. The majority of people who write proposals never think of this, and it will make a proposal stand out if it is included from the start.
Simple Budget
The last part of the pre-proposal is a simple budget. This budget should have five or six line items, and it should tell the foundation exactly how your organization intends to spend the money being requested. There should be a clear and explicit link between the budget and the proposed activities. This will give the program staff person a general idea of planned expenses and allow a subsequent request for more details if needed.
A brief pre-proposal can only outline the bare bones of a project idea. But that is all a program staff person needs to get excited about the plan, and it will be up to him or her to ask for more details necessary to put flesh on the skeleton. The fact of the matter that if a pre-proposal can get noticed among the large number that come in every year, you are well positioned in the grant seeking process.
Once a program staff person starts working with a proposed project, the chances of getting the grant are much better, because now it has a guide to take it through the rest of the process. That process will usually include a request for a full proposal and a site visit by the program staff person. But, since the program staff person will be helping it through these steps, there is no need to go into those details here. Instead, I have a checklist that can be used to judge if a pre-proposal will be effective.
Checklist
These are the kinds of things that are often looked for in every proposal that is received by foundations. If they are there, foundation staff are more likely to support the proposal than if they are not: be ahead of 90 percent of the proposals received by foundations. Most organizations are so focused on acquiring the money to get the project started, that they do not even think about how they are going to obtain the money to keep it going. A thoughtful, honest, and clear continuation plan is essential.
Evaluation
The pre-proposal needs to have a paragraph or two on how your organization intends to evaluate the results of the project. The evaluation plan should present what the organization wants to learn and how they will use the information to improve and sustain the project. It never hurts to ask a foundation for some money to hire an expert on the topic from another location to come in and evaluate the project. This will help both you and the funder to gauge how successful the project has been, and to learn lessons that will improve your work in the future. The majority of people who write proposals never think of this, and it will make a proposal stand out if it is included from the start.
Simple Budget
The last part of the pre-proposal is a simple budget. This budget should have five or six line items, and it should tell the foundation exactly how your organization intends to spend the money being requested. There should be a clear and explicit link between the budget and the proposed activities. This will give the program staff person a general idea of planned expenses and allow a subsequent request for more details if needed.
A brief pre-proposal can only outline the bare bones of a project idea. But that is all a program staff person needs to get excited about the plan, and it will be up to him or her to ask for more details necessary to put flesh on the skeleton. The fact of the matter that if a pre-proposal can get noticed among the large number that come in every year, you are well positioned in the grant seeking process.
Once a program staff person starts working with a proposed project, the chances of getting the grant are much better, because now it has a guide to take it through the rest of the process. That process will usually include a request for a full proposal and a site visit by the program staff person. But, since the program staff person will be helping it through these steps, there is no need to go into those details here. Instead, I have a checklist that can be used to judge if a pre-proposal will be effective.
Checklist
These are the kinds of things that are often looked for in every proposal that is received by foundations. If they are there, foundation staff are more likely to support the proposal than if they are not:

  • This is a new approach – most foundations like to fund new and exciting things, not more of the same. Foundations are increasingly interested in proposed solutions that build on the best available current knowledge, that show awareness of what has been tried, that builds on what works, and that replicates proven or promising ideas. The prevailing perception of innovation among foundations includes improvements in effectiveness of existing program approaches as well as completely new programs.
  •  The applicants have the know-how to do it – project staff do not have to be world-famous experts in this area, but they need to have some relevant experience and enthusiasm. Information about the principle staff members involved in the project will help demonstrate their qualifications to conduct the project.
  • The applicant is determined to do the project no matter what – foundations like to fund people who are committed to what they are doing, not people who will only do it if a funder gives them the money to do it.
  • The applicant has done their homework about the foundation – if an applicant has done their homework and can demonstrate a close match between their mission and the mission of the foundation, they are simply more impressive than someone who has just thrown together a proposal.
  • The applicants are working with the people they are trying to help, not doing things to them – if the applicants are trying to help children, have they involved them in putting together the pre-proposal? Foundations think it is important that the people who will be helped have some say in the matter. Information about the organization’s board of directors and related volunteer committees will help illustrate the range and types of representatives involved in leading and advising the project.
  • The project is being undertaken to improve the lives of people, not to make the organization bigger and richer – funders care about people and results more than they care about organizations.
  • The applicants are investing their own money in the project – this tells the foundations that your organization is committed to the project, and that it is important to you. It also helps to convince funders that your organization will continue it after their funding ends and commit itself to doing whatever it takes to find other funding.
  • The applicants have a comprehensive approach to the problem – no one can solve a complicated problem with a simple solution, and foundations are looking for people whose answer is at least sophisticated as the problem they are trying to solve and who link up with other organizations to work more comprehensively.
  • The applicants are willing to work collaboratively with anyone who can help –foundations want to see organizations working together to improve the lives of people.
  • The applicants are willing to have impartial evaluators assess their work – this will help both the applicants and the foundations learn to do a better job.
  • The applicants will continue the project after the foundation funding ceases –foundations like to help get things started that are so valuable to people that they will continue to operate even after the funding ends. There is little sense in starting a project that is going to end two or three years later, after foundation funding comes to an end.

2 Whats and 2 Hows of Proposal Writing

What is the need or problem that will be eliminated if the request is granted?
What doesn’t exist now that will be produced and will still remain when the money is gone?
How will the money be spent?
How much money is needed?
“Fund raising is not a simple exercise, nor should it ever be. Fund raising is the complex process of seeking to involve people in a cause that is responsive to human needs and that is worthy of gift support. Through people involvement, the organization creates an advocacy force that constitutes the core of its strength and assures its advancement into the future.” – Henry A. Rosso, founder and director emeritus of The Fund Raising School, a program of the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University